See that post below this one? The one where I infer that twitter is shit?
I am wrong on that call I reckon, and also right, stay with me here while I explain.
See, Twitter, in its inception was a social tool, and most folks, myself included would make remarkably dull twitters;
muttley is: idly doing fuck all.
muttley is: making a cuppa whilst staring out of a window.
muttley is: going for a shit.
Not exactly Anne Franks diary I think you will agree. So there, see Twitter = shite.
Well no, actually. Twitter has, by dint of everyone trying it for 2 weeks till they got bored, entered our collective conciousness. This has lead some actually interesting people to start, well, twittering:
To name but three.
See? Twitter + interesting people = not so shit after all. My apologies.
I still prefer tumblr though.
But how does Mr Fry manage 50000 followers, all replying and commenting and so on. It must do his head in. Can Twitter be interesting for non famous people? The jury’s still out on that one.
Also, how are they going to make any money? I see no advertising….